Ice Cream Man Double Murder Michael Keetley Heads Back To Court

Publish date: 2024-06-04

On Thanksgiving day in 2010, a previous frozen yogurt transporter named Michael Keetley was captured and placed being investigated in Hillsborough Province, Florida, for the homicide of two brothers and the injuring of four different casualties.

The occasion became known as the frozen yogurt man twofold homicide, with many subtleties still dinky after the terrible event.

The indictment charges that Keetley’s inspiration for the shooting was retribution after he was shot a few times during a past burglary while working his frozen yogurt truck.

The protection contends that Keetley could never have carried out the wrongdoing because of his wounds during the burglary.

In the event that Michael is sentenced, he will confront life in jail without the chance of parole.

On Thanksgiving day in 2010, a previous frozen yogurt transporter named Michael Keetley was captured and placed being investigated in Hillsborough District, Florida, for the homicide of two brothers and the injuring of four different casualties. The occasion became known as the frozen yogurt man twofold homicide, with many subtleties still dinky after the terrible event.

In spite of the fact that there has been media consideration encompassing the episode, it is as yet unclear why precisely this terrible demonstration happened. The preliminary is as yet progressing and all gatherings anticipate a fair consequence to be given. One way or the other, the two families have experienced a huge misfortune that can never be reclaimed, leaving them both in grieving.

Jan. 2010, #michaelkeetley working as an ice cream man. He was robbed by 2 Black masked males and 1 Black female, they took $12 & shot him. No arrests made. In Nov. 2010 Keetley is accused of shooting 6 people, killing 2. Prosecutors say he mistakenly targeted the wrong people. pic.twitter.com/CarWFgaalR

— Cathy Russon (@cathyrusson) March 6, 2023


The indictment claims that Keetley’s inspiration for the shooting was vengeance after he was shot a few times during a past burglary while working his frozen yogurt truck.

The protection contends that Keetley could never have carried out the wrongdoing because of his wounds during the burglary.

During the initial assertions, Partner State Lawyer Jennifer Johnson let attendants know that “fixation on seeking retribution was on the litigant’s brain” upon the arrival of the shooting.

She guaranteed that Keetley was disturbed that he was harmed during the burglary and that no other person needed to pay for it. The arraignment contended that this prompted his choice to complete the shooting. Then again, Guard Lawyer John Award kept up with that Keetley was not blameworthy on the grounds that he didn’t perpetrate the wrongdoing.

He contended that Keetley was not restoratively equipped for shooting anybody because of the wounds he supported during the burglary. A past preliminary on the homicide finished without a decision when legal hearers couldn’t concur. One of Keetley’s guard lawyers died of malignant growth, and one more turned into an appointed authority.

The ongoing preliminary started with the indictment and guard introducing their initial assertions.

TODAY: Nearly three years after his 2020 trial ended with a deadlocked jury, the retrial of former ice cream truck driver #MichaelKeetley is set to begin.

Prosecutors say Keetley was out for revenge when he shot six people in 2010. #CourtTV MORE HERE: https://t.co/eIBn2NYnPE pic.twitter.com/kTVlXwGV71

— Court TV (@CourtTV) March 6, 2023


The indictment contended that there was solid proof binds Keetley to the wrongdoing, including ballistics proof and observer IDs. The safeguard contended that the observer recognizable pieces of proof were powerless and that they could punch holes in the arraignment’s case through questioning and introducing their observers.

The preliminary endured a few days, and the jury thought for a day prior to declaring that they were deadlocked and unfit to arrive at a consistent decision.

The adjudicator pronounced a legal blunder and set another preliminary date for Keetley. The casualty’s mom and other shooting survivors were available in court during the malfeasance declaration and seemed deterred and disheartened. Associate State Lawyer Jay Pruner tended to them, saying, “It’s not finished; we rehash it.”

Keetley has kept up with his guiltlessness all through the almost very long term sit tight for his preliminary. Whenever sentenced, he faces a lifelong incarceration in jail, as the state has finished the quest for capital punishment. Opening articulations start on Monday in Tampa. In the event that michael is sentenced, he will confront life in jail without the chance of parole.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tcLGrqCdnaSeuqZ6wqikaKiVpL2tsY6imp5lk6eyormMppinZZSkwqO4xGakrqqUmr9uucicn5qdnGK4prHTpZyyZZiarqW%2FjJuYnKNdqbxur86uqa1lZW5%2BdYSQZ5%2BtpZw%3D